African Americans have been living in a burning building for many years, choking on the smoke as the flames burn closer and closer. Racism in America is like dust in the air. It seems invisible ā even if youāre choking on it ā until you let the sun in. Then you see itās everywhere. As long as we keep shining that light, we have a chance of cleaning it wherever it lands. But we have to stay vigilant, because itās always still in the air.
āKareem Abdul-Jabbar
Good morning!
Welcome to Nexus, a newsletter, podcast, and membership community for smart people applying smart building technologyāwritten by James Dice. If youāre new to Nexus, you might want to start here.
Hereās an outline of this weekās newsletter:
Enjoy!
Oh, and by the way: if you missed last weekās edition, you can find it here.
Disclaimer: James is a researcher at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). All opinions expressed via Nexus emails, podcasts, or on the website belong solely to James. No resources from NREL are used to support Nexus. NREL does not endorse or support any aspect of Nexus.
We all have individual roles in the fight for justice and racial equity. Iāve been examining my role and there so much more I can do. I hope youāre doing the same.
But what is our collective role? What is the responsibility of our industry as a whole?
At first glance, it can seem like there isnāt much overlap between racial equity and our day jobs. When Kareem Abdul-Jabbar writes about burning buildings, dust in the air, and letting the sun in, heās obviously not talking about fire protection systems, measuring indoor air quality, or adding daylighting controls. So we can just go about our business as usual, right?
I donāt think so. As Kareem says and as youāve seen in every city, the flames are burning closer and closer. Whatās the point of progress in the better buildings movement without progress in the Black Lives Matter movement? Why work to make buildings smarter/greener/healthier/safer when some human beings donāt have basic human rights and will never be able to set foot in some of those buildings?
āBusiness as usualā doesnāt make sense. And yet, when I look around, I donāt see much collective action from our industry. I donāt see us owning and integrating the initiatives of the BLM movement. What projects, working groups, position papers, standards, etc are aimed at the center of this Venn diagram?
If you have thoughts on this and where we go from here, Iād love to hear and learn from you. If thereās an existing group or initiative youāre aware of, I want to join or support or promote it. Others from the Nexus community do too.
Did Cities Fail Us? (Dror Poleg)
American cities have not been too kind to minorities because (most) American cities have not been, well, cities. They are not dense, not walkable, don't allow people to rely on public transport, don't create enough opportunity (or necessity) to interact with people from different socio-economic brackets.
Scientists Consider Indoor Ultraviolet Light to Zap Coronavirus in the Air (NYT)
Sales are up tenfold in the past month. āThe demand is through the roof.ā
(ā¦)
One of the challenges in the wider use of ultraviolet lights is showing that it works well in a variety of settings. Hospitals are generally well ventilated and well maintained. Would air in a cavernous department store flow close enough to the fixtures to be disinfected? Would a fixture on the wall of a restaurant be effective enough to halt virus from traveling from an infected diner at one table to the neighboring tables?
The Risks - Know Them - Avoid Them (Erin Bromage)āThis article has gone viral and for good reasonā¦ the author does a great job of distilling what we know about COVID science into a short and readable essay.
So throughout most of the country we are going to add fuel to the viral fire by reopening. It's going to happen if I like it or not, so my goal here is to try to guide you away from situations of high risk.
(ā¦)
Any environment that is enclosed, with poor air circulation and high density of people, spells trouble. All these infection events were indoors, with people closely-spaced, with lots of talking, singing, or yelling. The main sources for infection are home, workplace, public transport, social gatherings, and restaurants. This accounts for 90% of all transmission events.
How does smart building technology help with resiliency? This question came up in a recent meeting and I thought Iād share my answer. If youāre new to the resiliency conversation, NRELās resilience assessment methodology offers a great place to start. Itās a step by step approach to assessing, mitigating, and learning from risks.
In March, I wrote a (free) deep dive into how antifragility takes resiliency to the next level. Regardless of the terminology, I see 3 main areas of support provided by smart building tech:
What opportunities are you seeing?
As weāve been exploring in recent Nexus editions, the average building operator is about to get their hands on a lot more occupancy data.
How many people are here? What space are they in? Etc, etc, etc.
This isnāt just due to COVIDāit was already trending that way, thanks in part to energy codes requiring more occupancy sensors. Like the broader trend toward digitization, COVID-19 is just accelerating what was already happening.
Simultaneously, also partly thanks to building code and standard progressions, lower-cost submeters, and utility AMI installations, the average building operator is also getting more granular energy usage data. Analytics software can now calculate virtual meter points for end uses such as HVAC, lighting, plug loads, etc. Itās becoming commonplace to have 15-minute whole-building energy data and the ability to drill down into each piece of equipment.
As weāve discussed in the past (here and here), more data allows our smart building platforms to create better key performance indicators. KPIs allow the building operator to zero in quickly on under-performing buildings and systems actually do something with all that data.
What new KPIs are enabled by more prevalent occupancy and energy data? A recent study in Building and Environment explored just that. The authors argue that the typical commercial building just doesnāt adapt its energy consumption to real-time occupancy very well, and KPIs to measure āadaptable building performanceā are proposed to help change that.
They propose 3 sets of KPIs:
While technologies and control strategies exist to adapt building operations and energy use to lower occupancy, these metrics would enable evaluating and comparing the ability of these technologies to improve or maintain adaptability. With ever-increasing volatility in the occupancy of our buildings, these are numbers we should be tracking and paying attention to.
What do you think?
OK, thatās all for this weekāthanks for reading Nexus!
āJames
African Americans have been living in a burning building for many years, choking on the smoke as the flames burn closer and closer. Racism in America is like dust in the air. It seems invisible ā even if youāre choking on it ā until you let the sun in. Then you see itās everywhere. As long as we keep shining that light, we have a chance of cleaning it wherever it lands. But we have to stay vigilant, because itās always still in the air.
āKareem Abdul-Jabbar
Good morning!
Welcome to Nexus, a newsletter, podcast, and membership community for smart people applying smart building technologyāwritten by James Dice. If youāre new to Nexus, you might want to start here.
Hereās an outline of this weekās newsletter:
Enjoy!
Oh, and by the way: if you missed last weekās edition, you can find it here.
Disclaimer: James is a researcher at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). All opinions expressed via Nexus emails, podcasts, or on the website belong solely to James. No resources from NREL are used to support Nexus. NREL does not endorse or support any aspect of Nexus.
We all have individual roles in the fight for justice and racial equity. Iāve been examining my role and there so much more I can do. I hope youāre doing the same.
But what is our collective role? What is the responsibility of our industry as a whole?
At first glance, it can seem like there isnāt much overlap between racial equity and our day jobs. When Kareem Abdul-Jabbar writes about burning buildings, dust in the air, and letting the sun in, heās obviously not talking about fire protection systems, measuring indoor air quality, or adding daylighting controls. So we can just go about our business as usual, right?
I donāt think so. As Kareem says and as youāve seen in every city, the flames are burning closer and closer. Whatās the point of progress in the better buildings movement without progress in the Black Lives Matter movement? Why work to make buildings smarter/greener/healthier/safer when some human beings donāt have basic human rights and will never be able to set foot in some of those buildings?
āBusiness as usualā doesnāt make sense. And yet, when I look around, I donāt see much collective action from our industry. I donāt see us owning and integrating the initiatives of the BLM movement. What projects, working groups, position papers, standards, etc are aimed at the center of this Venn diagram?
If you have thoughts on this and where we go from here, Iād love to hear and learn from you. If thereās an existing group or initiative youāre aware of, I want to join or support or promote it. Others from the Nexus community do too.
Did Cities Fail Us? (Dror Poleg)
American cities have not been too kind to minorities because (most) American cities have not been, well, cities. They are not dense, not walkable, don't allow people to rely on public transport, don't create enough opportunity (or necessity) to interact with people from different socio-economic brackets.
Scientists Consider Indoor Ultraviolet Light to Zap Coronavirus in the Air (NYT)
Sales are up tenfold in the past month. āThe demand is through the roof.ā
(ā¦)
One of the challenges in the wider use of ultraviolet lights is showing that it works well in a variety of settings. Hospitals are generally well ventilated and well maintained. Would air in a cavernous department store flow close enough to the fixtures to be disinfected? Would a fixture on the wall of a restaurant be effective enough to halt virus from traveling from an infected diner at one table to the neighboring tables?
The Risks - Know Them - Avoid Them (Erin Bromage)āThis article has gone viral and for good reasonā¦ the author does a great job of distilling what we know about COVID science into a short and readable essay.
So throughout most of the country we are going to add fuel to the viral fire by reopening. It's going to happen if I like it or not, so my goal here is to try to guide you away from situations of high risk.
(ā¦)
Any environment that is enclosed, with poor air circulation and high density of people, spells trouble. All these infection events were indoors, with people closely-spaced, with lots of talking, singing, or yelling. The main sources for infection are home, workplace, public transport, social gatherings, and restaurants. This accounts for 90% of all transmission events.
How does smart building technology help with resiliency? This question came up in a recent meeting and I thought Iād share my answer. If youāre new to the resiliency conversation, NRELās resilience assessment methodology offers a great place to start. Itās a step by step approach to assessing, mitigating, and learning from risks.
In March, I wrote a (free) deep dive into how antifragility takes resiliency to the next level. Regardless of the terminology, I see 3 main areas of support provided by smart building tech:
What opportunities are you seeing?
As weāve been exploring in recent Nexus editions, the average building operator is about to get their hands on a lot more occupancy data.
How many people are here? What space are they in? Etc, etc, etc.
This isnāt just due to COVIDāit was already trending that way, thanks in part to energy codes requiring more occupancy sensors. Like the broader trend toward digitization, COVID-19 is just accelerating what was already happening.
Simultaneously, also partly thanks to building code and standard progressions, lower-cost submeters, and utility AMI installations, the average building operator is also getting more granular energy usage data. Analytics software can now calculate virtual meter points for end uses such as HVAC, lighting, plug loads, etc. Itās becoming commonplace to have 15-minute whole-building energy data and the ability to drill down into each piece of equipment.
As weāve discussed in the past (here and here), more data allows our smart building platforms to create better key performance indicators. KPIs allow the building operator to zero in quickly on under-performing buildings and systems actually do something with all that data.
What new KPIs are enabled by more prevalent occupancy and energy data? A recent study in Building and Environment explored just that. The authors argue that the typical commercial building just doesnāt adapt its energy consumption to real-time occupancy very well, and KPIs to measure āadaptable building performanceā are proposed to help change that.
They propose 3 sets of KPIs:
While technologies and control strategies exist to adapt building operations and energy use to lower occupancy, these metrics would enable evaluating and comparing the ability of these technologies to improve or maintain adaptability. With ever-increasing volatility in the occupancy of our buildings, these are numbers we should be tracking and paying attention to.
What do you think?
OK, thatās all for this weekāthanks for reading Nexus!
āJames
Head over to Nexus Connect and see whatās new in the community. Donāt forget to check out the latest member-only events.
Go to Nexus ConnectJoin Nexus Pro and get full access including invite-only member gatherings, access to the community chatroom Nexus Connect, networking opportunities, and deep dive essays.
Sign Up